TYING UP THE “NOTS” EXPLAINED, MAYBE

“What’s up with Figure #20?” a friend asked.

(Figure #20 is repeated below.)
img_00251.jpg
Fig. #20. This is not Maine, but Charlie lives within a camera’s eye of Mt. Rainier (Seattle), he takes a great picture, and he includes a little big water.

Well I cleverly linked the “not” buying of books to the “knot” tying of sailors everywhere, including Tenants Harbor. Then I used the picture of Mt. Rainier, the only picture I had from Charlie that was “not” Maine.

“Weird.”

Subtle

“Remote.”

Nuanced.

Third party intervener, “It’s a stretch.”

Okay.

“Then how about “little big water” in the caption? Is that somehow linked to Little Big Horn?”

That’s a thought, but no.The “big water” refers to the ocean (I’m sure I’ve heard or read “big water” so used) and the “little” refers both to Puget Sound — a little part of the Pacific Ocean next to which lies Seattle — and to the part of Charlie’s picture that Is ocean compared to the part that Is Mt. Rainier.

“Huh.”

Being clever is tricky business.

This entry was posted in Commenter Dialogue, General Discussion. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to TYING UP THE “NOTS” EXPLAINED, MAYBE

  1. Barb Minor says:

    Hmmm. I got it the first time. Maybe because I started learning from you at a tender age (U of M Library School, 1971). Still am learning from you…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *